This is in reference to Eli James and his recent broadcast about who the British are, Judah is Germany bla bla bla. All of it is just nonsense. Lets start with where the word British or Britain came from
Wiki- yes I know this is wiki, but this will be an ongoing thread on who the first British were.
The term Britain is a linguistic descendant (reflex) of one of the oldest known names for Great Britain, an island off the north-western coast of continental Europe. The terms Briton and British, similarly derived, refer to its inhabitants and, to varying extents, the smaller islands in the vicinity. “British Isles” is the only ancient name for these islands to survive in general usage. Its first written appearance was by Pytheas of Massalia in the 4th century BC. It originates with a group of P-Celtic speakers, resident on Great Britain, who were referred to, and perhaps referred to themselves, by the earliest known form of the term “British”.
Eli James claims that Alfred the Great was a king of Britain, but the truth is he was the king of England not Britain.
Traditionally, the Kingdom of England is usually considered to begin with Alfred the Great, King of Wessex, one of the petty kingdoms to rule the southeastern portion of Great Britain. While Alfred was not the first king to lay claim to rule all of the English, his rule represents the first unbroken line of Kings to rule the whole of England, the House of Wessex. The last monarch of England was Queen Anne, who became Queen of Great Britain when England merged with Scotland to form a union in 1707. For monarchs after Queen Anne, see List of British monarchs.
Again King Arthur
King Arthur was a legendary British leader who, according to medieval histories and romances, led the defence of Britain against Saxon invaders in the late 5th and early 6th centuries AD. The details of Arthur’s story are mainly composed of folklore and literary invention, and his historical existence is debated and disputed by modern historians. The sparse historical background of Arthur is gleaned from various sources, including the Annales Cambriae, the Historia Brittonum, and the writings of Gildas. Arthur’s name also occurs in early poetic sources such as Y Gododdin.
King Arthur, a British king was Celtic. Many CI people and even British Israel people believe King Arthur was a blood relative of Joseph of Arimathea.
How do Eli James’ Saxons become “British” if they were fighting against the British?
Another hard truth about Scythians. The Saxons can only speculate that they are Scythians, the Scots say they are Scythians in their Declaration of Arbroath.
Eli James claims that Britain was Albion before the Saxons invaded, but anyone can see this was not true.
Albion was a British name:
The Brittonic name for the island, Hellenised as Albíōn (Ἀλβίων) and Latinised as Albiō (genitive Albionis), derives from the Proto-Celtic nasal stem *Albi̯iū (oblique *Albiion-) and survived in Old Irish as Albu (genitive Albann). The name originally referred to Britain as a whole, but was later restricted to Caledonia (giving the modern Scottish Gaelic name for Scotland, Alba). The root *albiio- is also found in Gaulish and Galatian albio- (“world”) and Welsh elfydd (elbid, “earth, world, land, country, district”). It may be related to other European and Mediterranean toponyms such as Alpes and Albania. It has two possible etymologies: either *albho-, a Proto-Indo-European root meaning “white” (perhaps in reference to the white southern shores of the island, though Celtic linguist Xavier Delamarre argued that it originally meant “the world above, the visible world”, in opposition to “the world below”, i.e., the underworld), or *alb-, Proto-Indo-European for “hill”.
To say Albion isn’t or wasnt British is like saying Texas isnt an American state because it has a different name. Britain was a word used for all the British isles including Scotland (which was Ireland before it was Scotland).
Eli James simply picks an English King and makes him out to be a God, therefore he can also steal names, dates and geographical locations. The truth is Brittany in todays France and Britain was there somewhere around 2000 years before the Saxons got there.
It was indeed “the world above” the world below, but today things are upside down including Britain thanks to the Jews and to people who should never attempt to interpret history from their own jewish history books and or British Israel who think they are Judah too.
Not only did Germans and their brothers, the Romans invade Britain and Brittany (in Amorica), but they knew it was Britain they were invading…..and then kind of stole the name.
The word “Brittany”, along with its French, Breton and Gallo equivalents “Bretagne”, “Breizh” and “Bertaèyn”, derive from the Latin Britannia, which means “Britons‘ land”. This word has been used by the Romans since the 1st century to name Great Britain, and more specifically the Roman province of Britain. This word derives from a Greek word, Πρεττανικη (Prettanike) or Βρεττανίαι (Brettaniai), used by Pytheas, an explorer from Massalia who visited the British Islands around 320 BC.
The Romans called Brittany Armorica, together with a quite indefinite region that extended along the Channel coast from the Seine estuary to the Loire estuary, and according to several sources, maybe along the Atlantic coast to the Garonne estuary. This term probably comes from a Gallic word, aremorica, which means “close to the sea”. Another name, Letauia (in English “Litavis“), was used until the 12th century. It possibly means “wide and flat” or “to expand” and it gave the Welsh name for Brittany: Llydaw.
The Cruthin/Pretani (the same name rendered in different forms of Celtic languages) were the oldest named people in the British Isles. This is beyond doubt, and attested to by so many authentic sources that politically-motivated “revisionists” cannot get around that fact. The Greeks called our islands Pretannikai Nesoi – the British Isles, after the Pretani/Cruthin people who lived there, probably based on the writings of the explorer Pytheas in 325 BC.
325 BC, was that before the Anglos got there? If Pytheas knew this as Britain in 325 BC it means it could have gone back even further.
Eli James says the Picts were Jews. Whats left to say? Some of you out there will claim I am taking a crack at CI because Eli James is on so many shows representing CI and bringing Jews into the movement more than anyone else, but I am not taking a crack at CI I am taking a crack at people who use CI to spread historical falsities. If you use false history and claim it is truth you obviously have no need to learn the truth.
The Romans always knew Britain as Britain or Pretani as did the Greeks, it is the Anglos who renamed a portion of it “England”.
Lets take a quick look at Bavaria, which is without a doubt the nicest part of Germany and has always had the best people in Germany.
The earliest known inhabitants that are mentioned in written sources were the Celts, participating in the widespread La Tène culture, whom the Romans subdued just before the commencement of the Christian era; founding colonies among them and including their land in the provinces of Raetia and Noricum. The Roman centre of administration for this area was Castra Regina (modern-day Regensburg).
Im going to tell you true history, the Anglos allowed the Jews into Germany and then brought them into Britain and now they claim they are the only ones who fought against Jews (and dont want to fight against them right now). Like Trump and like the Jews they come to your house, make a pig sty out of it and then claim we have a dirty house. No you have a dirty house!.