Dirty Jobs

Its time you learned how to fix one of these

Its time you learned how to fix one of these

Lapid Wants Haredim To Fill Open Construction Jobs
Shmarya Rosenberg • FailedMessiah.com

Israel’s Finance Minister Yair Lapid met earlier this week with two leaders in Israel’s construction industry, who told him serious manpower shortages they are facing, Yeshiva World reported.

Lapid reportedly suggested they reach out to haredim to fill some of those open jobs, pointing out that the government’s recent decision to change eligibility criteria for government subsidized housing will force many haredim to get jobs.

The construction industry representatives reportedly told Lapid that they are in the process of opening training courses for haredim for various trades, including, for example, building construction electrician, and said they hope haredim will react positively to the job opportunities their vocational training courses will provide.

Time to get the hard hats on. We will discuss work next week.

Time to get the hard hats on. We will discuss work next week.

~ How many years now has it been that these, this species has been in the Jew state without working? I suppose we are to believe it is just the haredim that don’t work because they are studying the Torah that they completely re wrote. These people hate hookers, but they love Russian blonde hookers, they hate seeing women wearing short skirts, yet Hollywood and TV is nothing but Jewish women running around in short skirts. Jews love to keep the dumb goyim in a complete state of confusion.

Internet radio shows claim they are against Jews, but they cant wait to quote a Jew or get one of their heroes on and shut the phones off to non Jews who point this reptilian behavior out. Everyone knows Jews did 9/11, but we have Jewish internet radio hosts claiming it was someone by another name (take your pick of synonyms that all mean Jew in some round about way today). Some will say Israel did 9/11, some say Zionists did 9/11,

some say Jews did 9/11 completely unaware what a

"Im a business man"

“Im a business man”

Jew even is. Is this all by design or is Satan as subtle as ever as usual?

When you hear these people who use synonyms of any kind ask them what Caiaphas was. Lets go to the root of what words mean. Was Caiaphas a Jew? Was he even an Israelite? Herod and Caiaphas didn’t believe (there is that word “believe”) in a Messiah or the prophets so they said, but why then would they want the first born Judahites killed? And why would they not want their awaited Messiah? Because the Messiah was not only the king of the House of Judah, but all the Israelites and not the king of Herod and Caiaphas. Can anyone tell me where the Israelites went? It seems to be a question not wanted by all of these internet radio hosts including your favorite so called Catholic heroes (take your pic). One has a site called “On the Contrary”. Are we contrary to Jews or are they contrary to us? It doesn’t take a doctor to figure that out. Paul settled that one a long time ago.

The name games and word games can only be figured out by putting the pieces of the puzzle together yourself. Satan is the prince of the air and he has many levels of lies, some far more complicated than others and it’s up to you and you alone to cut through it all even if you make a fool out of yourself it may be what you have to do to get to the next step because they take you as fools. You are never a fool to question anything. Some questions have been designed to make you a fool for asking deliberately. You simply collect all the pieces and eventually you will see pieces that don’t fit what you already know and what nobody else is asking. Have no fear!

Some examples you have heard before:  White networks bringing in non whites, White professors and Doctors who are clueless on White history (or simply Jews themselves or married Jews), radio hosts who claim to be Christians and never take calls because they know they will get taken to the cleaners, internet writers who say everything was a sham from the very beginning (everything) and as new truth comes out they are always there to push you, the unsuspecting victim, off the cliff. There are historians so they say who never opened the Bible in their lives throwing tidbits of BS at you to get your attention, book writers who write books about things they copied from a plethora of disinformation crypto Jews and the most sickening of them all are the Jews themselves who claim to be on our side as they did in the Apocryphal books that got us into this mess to begin with and people “believe” them (people you were told not to even be with).

Some so called internet heroes throw out the red carpet to Jews who are also ex Marines as if we would want them in our foxhole to fight people Jews themselves instigated us against. It’s not bad enough that Jews control our main stream media, but even our so called own want to bring the Jews into the only freedom we have left on the internet. The fools look for Jews to solve 9/11, the USS Liberty bombing, etc etc, but there isn’t one Jew (or their proselytes) exposing who Caiaphas and Herod were.

It’s a dirty job, but someone has to do it.

*This week two so called Christians quoted the same Rabbi for truth (Stephen Wise) when he said “Communism is Judaism” (Texe Marrs and Rick Adams). What kind of message does this send to their audience?

1. Jews can be trusted?

2. Rabbi’s can be trusted?

3. Ashkenazi’s can be trusted?

What this really does is send the message “only some Jews are the problem” even though the whole concepts of Jews is a complete and total LIE! To use a Jew for truth is schizophrenia and counter productive, it keeps Jew business as usual.

Do we need Jews for truth? We need Jews for truth like we need their kosher food.

Ask yourselves this; did John the Baptist ever use a Rabbi for truth? Did Jesus ever use a Rabbi for truth? He used them to show their hypocrisy, but never to show they were of any kind of truth. You aren’t even supposed to be calling anyone Rabbi to begin with. I will show Jews reporting themselves in the news, but you should never trust anything they say nor should you trust they swing chickens around their heads for God. Never trust them, never put them in the light of truth because they are not of it. If these so called Christian broadcasters think our God wants these people used for truth it is in defiance of everything he came here for and suffered for. They are in the spotlight so they must sell out so everyone else will fall in like ducks in a row.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to Dirty Jobs

  1. sschmwp says:

    About Herod the Edomite and how it relates to the “antichrist” and Michael:

    Various folks seem to be trying to place a “Nazi” theme into CI. At least one of them is attempting to make Hitler out to be Michael the “Archangel” (chief messenger).

    The fictional “antichrist,” whom many people believe is a yet to be revealed individual, is often invented by interpreting Daniel 8:23-25 and Daniel 11:36-45 in a futuristic way, instead of properly interpreting them as events that have already transpired. Dan 8:23-25 is most likely describing Muhammad, and the “bad guy” of Dan 11 is most surely referring to Herod the Edomite (see: http://www.gracecentered.com/christian_forums/theology/prophesies-of-daniel-chapter-eleven/5/?wap2).

    There is little to no room given for Dan 8 and 11 to be interpreted futuristically. So, since it is basically undeniable that the end of Dan 11, with the king written of going forth with great fury to destroy and utterly make away many, is referring to Herod, this would most likely make the Michael of Dan 12:1 out to be Jesus Christ (the true Chief Messenger). There is also a lot of debate as to whether Michael is a different entity than Jesus.

    I do not understand how you can start reading about events at the end of Dan 11 that already happened more than 2,000 years ago, and then start reading the next chapter and turn yourself into a semi-futurist by interpreting the Michael of Dan 12:1 out to be Adolf Hitler, who was alive almost 2,000 years after the events that happened at the end of Dan 11 transpired. There is no way the Michael of Dan 12:1 was Hitler. I can think of several intelligent reasons as to why it would be an embarrassment for Michael to be identified as Hitler. What is even worse is that are some who even believe that Hitler was literally the “Second Coming.”

    I critiqued CI before and suggested that it be called “Christian Hitlerism,” and I am probably right on when it comes to certain groups within CI.

    These futurist interpretations seem very unlikely compared to the historical ones. There are so many Bible believers who go on and on about “the antichrist” boogeyman whom they expect to come and set up his “system.” I attended a “church” in the area last week and their pastor was talking about this. Even Bro Nate talks about “the antichrist” and how he will be a “Jew.” The future coming “antichrist” is a fable invented by men with futurist interpretations.

  2. melgibstein says:

    of course the anti Christ is the Jew(s) and how anyone could deny that is a fruitcake. Only people dont know who the Jews are, they think the House of Judah or the Judahites would have to be antichrists in their spider webbed brains. This is why people need to start bombarding all these shill radio hosts with who Herod and Caiaphas were and why the churches feel as if it isnt important. When they see that lie its wake up time. Then they will know what a Jew is.

  3. melgibstein says:

    One from RBN: Hear Ye Hear Ye Bob the Jew Tuskin takes on the Jew main stream media
    http://republicbroadcasting.org/index.php?cmd=news.article&articleID=5517

    They want you to be completely confused. Jews are bad, Jews are good. Red light, green light.

    Jews will stay as long as they are asked to stay and then some. In the meantime get the popcorn and feed your face while they ravage your land and home from every direction.

  4. sschmwp says:

    Some more info on who Michael most likely is:

    Many Christians get offended by the belief that Michael the chief messenger is Jesus Christ. Some attribute this belief to Jehovah Witnesses. They will tell you that it is blasphemy to suggest Jesus is a mere “angel.” But, this revolves around a transliterated word. Why could not Jesus also be a “messenger” (“angel”)? If He is a messenger, this would make Him the Chief Messenger, just like He is the Chief Shepherd (1 Pet 5:4).

    1 Peter 5:4, “And when the chief Shepherd shall appear, ye shall receive a crown of glory that fadeth not away.”

    Jude 1:9, “Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.”

    They then go to this verse and tell us that Michael could not be Jesus because Michael said “The Lord rebuke thee” in this verse. So, how could Michael be Jesus if it clearly says in this verse that Michael rebuked “the devil” in the authority of “The Lord”?

    Well, check this out, which I believe Jude is referring to:

    Zec 3:2, “And the LORD said unto Satan, The LORD rebuke thee, O Satan; even the LORD that hath chosen Jerusalem rebuke thee: is not this a brand plucked out of the fire?”

    Here we have “The Lord” rebuking “Satan” in the authority of ” The Lord”!

    There are no other “chief messengers” besides Michael in the Bible except for in Apocryphal literature.

  5. sschmwp says:

    It is batshit crazy to suggest Hitler was Jesus Christ (Michael). But, this is what Finck and some others are claiming. None of the people in Finck’s group have even bothered to attempt refuting my interpretation of who Hitler was in the Bible (a pseudo-Christ), because they probably can’t! It would throw their whole reality apart and make them seem weird if they ever admitted that my thesis on Hitler was correct, because Hitler is an integral part of their dogma. This is one of the reasons as to why I have distanced myself from mainstream CI. That and the other reason is they seem to be suggesting that all races other than Whites are going to be exterminated and then end up the “lake of fire.” I have not come to those same conclusions, but I do know that many non-Whites are a mongrelized species that God did not create as a pure race. Also, these non-Whites have done some serious damage to us. Maybe not all of them collectively, but many have. We are also hated by many of them. As I mentioned before, if you pay close attention to Obadiah, it is not just Esau who will drink of God’s cup of wrath and be as though they never were. I’m not afraid to admit that, but where do we draw the line? All of the non-White nations who are our enemies are going to “get theirs,” but are all of the non-Whites our enemies? That is not something that I have set a fixed opinion on. I know that I would not utterly exterminate them as a whole if I had the power to, because I have not proven that this is God’s Will. I admit myself that I am somewhat angry with them, and I despise my nation becoming a multiracial cesspool. But, then again, I have been forced to be around some non-Whites who acted decently towards me. The other day one of them saw me sitting outside and offered me something to eat and a soda for free, and I was just minding my own business.

    Following the timeline of Daniel chapters 11 and 12, and seeing as though the most accurate interpretation of the bad king of Daniel 11 is that it is referring to Herod the “Great,” the most logical interpretation of Daniel 12:1 is that the Michael referred to in that verse is Jesus Christ, because he was alive in the time of Herod.

    In my view, it is blasphemy to suggest Hitler was Michael the chief messenger. Most (or all?) of the evidence concludes that Michael is Jesus.

    Anyway, there are some in CI who would suggest that I am sowing division in CI instead of unity, but even Jesus came to cause division:

    Luke 12:51-53, “Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division: For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three. The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.”

    I only wrote about what my interpretations are because that is what they are. I never intended to sow discord. I adhere to the racial message of the Bible, so that is why I *might* consider myself to be CI. But, I think of myself as non-denominational, although I do have appreciation for some CI authors and their labors. If I can be labeled as “CI,” I do not have much of an issue with that.

    Anyway, you do not need to reply. I’ll check up on you later, though.

  6. melgibstein says:

    I dont follow any man I follow the truth. No man has all the answers and no man is perfect. Some have to fall on their face. I am not in this to point to any man, although I do give praise to those who I believe honestly devoted themselves to the truth knowing who their opposition always is. So I dont praise any one person for everything, there are some people I dont like and still have to admit they are telling the truth when they do. Finck has done some great work on the Phoenicians and whether he is on the side of truth or not isnt really important because it has fueled more research into issues which otherwise may have never been discussed. What history were you taught in school about the Phoenicians? There is a reason that we were taught next to nothing. Every bit of writing I find on the Phoenicians says that they were Canaanites, yet they were the root of the Celts, Gauls and Illyrians (the white race) and that would make the white race all Canaanites. No, I think the Jews are lying again. Its up to each and every one of us to get the truth on our own and each one of us can contribute and build upon it. As long as Jews control the media that truth will never be discussed. Its obvious that every media entity with the ability to get the truth out has been compromised. So instead we will hear the soft Jew friendly side of everything there is. Finck and others are at least attempting to tear those Jew walls down and if you have noticed I havent bashed Finck or praised him. Jews would love to turn this around and make it about individuals and it isnt, its about true history as opposed to Jew hogwash history and we know anything opposing Jew hogwash history is going to make people think and thats what we all should want. Jews dont want anyone wandering off their plantation and they know its gonna happen again….and they know what that means. Uniting Christians again with truth is the Jews biggest fear. That is the Jew kryptonite.

  7. sschmwp says:

    Daniel 10:21, “But I will shew thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince.”

    This verse says Michael is our prince.

    Daniel 10:13, “But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia.”

    Yet this verse in the KJV says Michael is *one of* the chief princes. Interesting.

    “But the prince of the kingdom of the Persians withstood me twenty-one days: and behold, Michael, one of the princes, came to help me; and I left him there with the chief of the kingdom of the Persians.” – Brenton LXX (Septuagint).

    The Brenton Septuagint (Greek version of the OT) translates it as “one of the princes.” I’m not sure what the deal is.

    Michael is called a “great prince” in Daniel 12:1 and Daniel 8:25 mentions the “prince of princes.” One of Jesus’ titles is the “prince of peace” (Isa 9:6). But, he is not just a “prince,” but a King.

    Revelation 12:5 mentions one who is about to rule the nations with a rod of iron, and this surely is referring to Jesus Christ. Skip down to verse 7 and it mentions Michael and the war in “heaven” (which I believe is referring to *this* realm on Earth). And then skip down to verse 10 and after the war it mentions the kingdom of God and the power of His “Christ” (Anointed), which seems to indicate that Michael is a “Christ.” But, there is more than one “Christ”; there was a “Christ” named Cyrus in the OT.

    There is so much speculation as to who Michael is, but there is evidence to suggest that Michael really is Jesus the Christ. It might not be entirely provable that Jesus is Michael the chief messenger, but it seems very possible. Jesus has several titles that begin with “chief,” and there are no other “messengers” in the canonized Books of the Bible who are given the title of “chief messenger.”

    There might be some valid points to consider as to why Michael is a different entity than Jesus Christ, and maybe I will gather all of the arguments as to why Jesus is not the “archangel” (chief messenger) Michael and post them here. Michael means “Who is like God?” and it is meant as a question. The most likely answer to that question is that nobody can be likened to our God, and certainly not Hitler. Hitler slandered the Old Testament as a “Jew” book, and I know that even if Michael is not Jesus, that someone of such high renown and honor as Michael the chief messenger would not be stupid enough to discard the OT. I’m not foolish enough to conclude that Michael was Adolf Hitler in the flesh, but at one point I had a theory that he might have been, but I never claimed my theory was correct.

    Whatever the case is, I’m not going to rob God of His glory by replacing Him with Hitler, and, if Jesus is not Michael, I’m not going to rob Michael of his position by substituting him with Hitler. If I had to bet my eternal soul on it, I would say that Hitler was NOT Michael. Claiming Michael is Hitler is quite a stretch.

    A website I found which attempts to document that Jesus is Michael is http://biblelight.net/michael.htm.

    It should be noted that Jesus is referred to by other names both in the Old and New Testament. One such name given is Emmanuel (“God with us”), which is written of in both Testaments. So, it is not that much of a stretch to consider that Michael is yet another name linked with Jesus.

    If Finck is legit and sincere, I only wish the best for him. I said the same thing for Downey as well. There are good articles by both of them that I have appreciated.

    • melgibstein says:

      anywhere you see “prince” it also shows a racially related person, but the churches will disregard that fact. If there are racially related princes there are other racially related princes as well not of the same family or there would be no use for the word, at least that is what the book teaches, yet nobody will put it together.

      “Cohanim” or Kohen was a word for “prince” depicting a related high priest (Levites), yet the high priests were Idumeans in Christ’s time. You wont hear anything about that at the Judeo Bible class.

      • melgibstein says:

        Who hath taken this counsel against Tyre, the crowning city, whose merchants are princes, whose traffickers are the honourable of the earth?
        Isaiah 23:8

  8. sschmwp says:

    To be honest, I have gotten jack shit in knowledge from Finck. I maybe listened to 5% or less of the dialogue between Finck and “Eli James.” I read a FEW articles on his website after that, but that marks the end of my Finck reading. If Finck does not repent for mocking our God with his Hitler obsession, I say let him be Anathema. The same goes for Downey. Mark would not be his sidekick if they were not both Hitler idolaters. At the very least, they ought to admit that Hitler was not “Michael the Archangel.”

    • melgibstein says:

      Ive never heard Finck regard Hitler as that. I will say that Finck has provided proof that I never heard about Hitler being a Christian. If he was indeed a Christian Im all for him. I honestly havent looked into Hitler enough, but my allegiance would be with the German people and not one man and they obviously believed in him. I have to say that I have always felt the people who say Hitler was a Jew are usually the ones who side with Jews when Jew issues come up that are questionable (usually not always). Are there people using Hitler as a tool to mislead? Without a doubt and why I follow no man I follow the truth. Some men do great things and make mistakes too. The question is what is inside someones soul and that isnt for me to decide. I am in charge of my own soul and only trust people with time. Some people Ive known all my life and cant allow truth in, but it doesnt mean I dont trust them. I am here to get people to do the research themselves and understand the main enemy of mankind (and I say that with no reservation as Paul more or less did). Thats where I stand and thats where Ive stood. No man can change what I have learned already and turn it all upside down. There is truth I can prove and truth I cannot prove yet. Can I be tricked by people who tell the truth and then lead their followers off the cliff? No, because I am no-ones follower except the truth. Where the truth is…….that is where I’m headed. In the end I will answer for myself.

      • sschmwp says:

        Brother,

        Finck and his followers are going there. Search Google for “site:christogenea.org hitler Michael”

        I know for a fact that this is Finck’s position, and I also know that this is idolatry, which leads all of his followers into the same pit!

        In Finck’s mind, Hitler was Michael the Archangel. They’re attempting to make this official CI “doctrine.”

        Hey, Downey, try correcting your “sidekick,” since you ought to know better!

  9. sschmwp says:

    At first glance in mid-2009 I considered Finck to be a sincere individual with no hidden agenda. After a while my bullshit alarm went off way too often. I also consider it to be another “red flag” for a former cop who beat to death a so-called “minority” to be in FBI custody (read the start of my treatise about the FBI and the KKK) and then be sent to prison where he remained untouched (or not?) by all of the other inmates, and was then released more than a decade later as a Greek and CI scholar, who is now acting as a leading mouthpiece for what is called “Christian Identity.” If Finck’s brand of “CI” is such a terrible threat to our enemies, why even let him be released from prison so that he could threaten the “powers that be” with his “truth”? Some of the other prisoners could have been recruited to kill Finck while he was in prison, and it would not have been that shocking to find out that he was killed while in prison considering what he was in for. It would have been a relatively easy murder to get away with. But, the kikes or whoever (FBI?) let him go home to his mother to preach his brand of CI on the Internet. The other prisoners have means to find out what other inmates are in for, and being a former cop who beat to death one of the “minorities” who infest our prisons puts you at a very high risk. Was he really in the main prison population or was he secured somewhere else, while studying up on CI to his hearts content, so that he could later be released as a CI “scholar” to infiltrate, spy, and mislead? I also remember that it was pointed out by someone that he was caught lying about the details of his arrest and prison sentence. Before he started researching CI for so long while in prison (I have heard that CI is persecuted in “our” prisons, whereby getting access to CI curriculum is difficult!), I doubt that he knew that the commandment to “do no murder” only applies to Adamkind (the White race) and this law is meant for every Adamite to follow amongst ourselves. So, this does say something about his character, to brutally beat to death a foreigner (non-Adamite) while not knowing that, technically, it was not MURDER in God’s Law, but that it was still murder in man’s law. You might point out that King David was also an adulterer and involved in murder (manslaughter?). Well, this is true, and a good point to make.

    I can go into details about some more “red flags” but they border on slander so I’m not going to. You can teach 95+% of the Bible Truth and use the other 5% to throw in lies and idolatries which *destroy* us (on purpose?) and still manage to go undetected for a long time. Is Finck a CI plant? It is definitely not off the table to consider this. If I want to hear worshipful talk about Hitler I might tune into Finck again sometime, but I have outgrown this Hitler crap and pegged him for what he really was in the Bible, and he was most surely not Michael *the* chief messenger (“archangel”), as Finck and his followers believe. My interpretation of who Hitler was in the Bible is much more logical than theirs, especially considering that there is much evidence to link Michael with Jesus, which would make them idolaters for replacing Jesus with Hitler. Since I suspect that many of the CI pastors are frauds, they could truly have a secret agenda, and one of those agendas could be to “Nazify” the racial message of the Bible and restore Hitler for public acceptance and praise. Either that, or it is possibly to make us look like a bunch of whacky “Nazis” with Hitler fetishes, so that the general public is turned off to the racial message of the Bible. If that is one of their main agendas, they will NEVER consider cutting the “Nazi” and Hitler crap out of CI, because they were planted into CI for these nefarious agendas. It is like talking to a brick wall when discussing Hitler with them, because they have made up their minds already and are exceedingly stiff necked on this serious issue. I wonder if this is because of the idols of their heart, or if it is because they are trying to sabotage the truth. Finck released his NT translation with swastikas on it and “Yahweh” inserted all over the NT, when the “Tetragrammaton” is not even in the NT manuscripts. Another work he has published is titled “Christ Reich.” Someone found an image on Christogenea that says “Christ Reich” with a picture of Adolf Hitler on it. Finck claims that someone else made that image and sent it to him, but, if he believes that Hitler was Michael the Christ of Revelation 12 and Daniel 12, this image should not offend him at all because it fits in with his Hitler fantasies.

    My suspicions grow by the day, and I believe that, Biblically, I am not supposed to fellowship with many teachers in CI. If they are pureblooded Adamites (some of them have already been exposed as being mixed mongrels; two of them were or still are communicating with Finck), I hope that I am wrong about them, but my conscience reasoning and intuition has lead me away from them. It seems that if you’re not on board with the Hitler idolatry that infects “CI,” then you’re not a very good “CI” adherent. Well, I do not consider myself to belong to any sect or cult, but I will say without shame that I am a “C” (Christian).

    I have taken 2 or 3 minor concepts and/or interpretations from Finck, but, other than that, I have not been a Finck fanboy and stopped reading his articles and listening to his broadcasts quite some time ago. Another thing that upsets me about Finck is that he claims that it is forbidden for us to defend ourselves from the “Jews” who are presently exterminating us, so we can’t have any pogroms against them. Well, this kind of sounds like “Jew” talk to me, and our ancestors have had plenty of pogroms in their efforts to defend themselves from “Jew” malice. So, why is it different for us at this time, that we can’t put an end to our dispossession and ongoing genocide? This is defeatist bullshit, IMHO. I’m not buying this “wait until ‘Yahweh’ and the ‘angels’ arrive on a UFO to save us” crap, because not only is it unrealistic and silly, it fits in with what the “Jews” would want us to believe.

    This is my take on “CI,” and in particular, W. Finck, who has basically set himself up as some kind of “CI” authority. I am not officially “CI” because I do not want to be linked with their false doctrines. At best, I will just say that most other denominations are much worse than CI. At this point, I still have a lot of “proving” to do with what the Bible declares in proper *context* and I am skeptical of CI doctrines by default unless I can prove them to be legit.

    Yeah, I really do hope Finck is for real, with a sincere heart, and is not just infiltrating. I’m leaving CI in peace. My reasons are many, but one of the subjects I have brought up about Adolf Hitler is one of my obvious reasons. It is plain as day that Hitler matches the description of a pseudo “Christ” but these clowns are making him into Michael (Jesus) the Christ. We are instructed not to have fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, and this is exactly what the Hitler idolatry is. It is written also that idolaters will not enter into the kingdom of God. And what is worse, some form of private idolatry that goes on between yourself and nobody else once in a blue moon, or a public idolatry that you seduce others into, which Finck has been doing? I’d say that the latter is far worse. I still stand by whatever I have written in my treatise, although I’d like to take time to review it. If this still makes me “CI” then that is fine by me. The non-violence crowd are merely rejecting what the Bible declares, which makes them hostile to God. I actually kind of liked reading Downey’s stuff from time to time, but he is in on the idolatry problem I have mentioned and I have not been keeping up with him. Is this just me throwing the baby out with the bath water? Not really. If they publicly repent for the things I have mentioned, this will at least show to me that they might be for real. But, I do not expect this.

    Wish you the best, and I will be back to check up on you in a bit. I recently had the opportunity to move back into a home, which was unexpected. But, I’ll have to wait another 30+ days and keep camping out in the woods (ha ha). We had an entire week here that was 105+ degrees F.

    • Ray Zerwitt says:

      Are you trying to latch on to some new fanatical religious movement? Christianity is underground and always has been.
      Don’t share holy things with dogs (got Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson?) and don’t cast your pearls before swine.
      That should be proof enough.

      • sschmwp says:

        Whatever so-called “evil” (e.g., violence) the “Nazis” did commit is like childsplay to what we Biblically are supposed to be doing. If this understanding of mine makes me “fanatical” I do not care, it is all a matter of wording. So long as I am not telling lies but speak the truth, you can call me anything you want and it will not “phase” me. True Christianity is not ALWAYS going to be hiding out “underground” because the Truth wins in the end. I do not share holy things with anyone other than my own kind. If my own kind happens to be swine, I will find out soon enough and stop casting “pearls.”

  10. sschmwp says:

    Folks, for the record, this is the only proof you need to dispell the MYTH that there is someone ELSE who is like God:

    Deu 33:26-29, “There is none like unto the God of Jeshurun, who rideth upon the heaven in thy help, and in his excellency on the sky. The eternal God is thy refuge, and underneath are the everlasting arms: and he shall thrust out the enemy from before thee; and shall say, DESTROY THEM. Israel then shall dwell in safety alone: the fountain of Jacob shall be upon a land of corn and wine; also his heavens shall drop down dew. Happy art thou, O Israel: who is like unto thee, O people saved by the Lord, the shield of thy help, and who is the sword of thy excellency! and thine enemies shall be found liars unto thee; and thou shalt tread upon their high places.”

    Michael means “Who is like God?” and to suggest that Hitler is “like God” is a LIE. So, don’t go looking through history to find someone who was “like God” in order to discover who Michael the “archangel” (chief messenger) was, unless you want to figure that Jesus was the chief messenger, like He is the chief shepherd and chief cornerstone.

  11. Jew Hater says:

    Josepheus was a jew liar and you believe there actually was a Caiaphas? That’s insane. Did you meet Caiaphas? It’s all bullshit along with the christianity gig.

  12. Jew Hater says:

    I’ll put the onus back on you since you didn’t answer my question. Prove to us you’re not controlled opposition.

  13. melgibstein says:

    I cant prove the sun will come up tomorrow but it will. I cant prove its dark out where I am or light out where Im not. What can you prove?

    I cant prove anything, but I can prove what I know from experience. I know if I ride my bicycle at a certain intersection, even though there isnt a car in sight, that a car will be there to run me over on my bicycle if I dont look.

    You cant be taught truth, you have to learn it on your own and take people who you know you can trust for a guide. I know you can never take a Jews word for trust and why I know they never had anything to do with the Bible or God. He didnt come for them, they are from below. Thats all I have to say on the matter. You can ask me questions all day and have me PROVE it to you. You have to prove it yourself and see where it leads you.

  14. Jew Hater says:

    I’ve already proven it for myself. One item we do agree on is that the jew is the virus in amerikan’s veins, and they have to be exterminated. I wish christianity were true as I grew up a Lutheran. I no longer can accept the biblical contradictions my pastor nerver once mentioned on Sundays. I will no longer buy that there is a God who condones wars in the name of religion. Now I am constantly reminded by this madness with the goy bells telling all the sheeple it’s time to go to work, time for lunch and it’s time for rest. 501 c3s that bow to a false god on the east coast run by the jews! Seems as though you are a wise person and wish you the best in your journey on this mess of what we call earth.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s