The truth about Jews is there is no truth about Jews. On one hand we call the Ashkenazi’s Jews because of their religion, we call Ethiopian Jews Jewish because they have Jewish ancestry and one can’t help but get caught up in a whirlwind of Jewish pilpilism. If you have ever seen a dog chasing its tail it is what most non Jews are doing when trying to figure out what a Jew is.
We all know there is a major difference between Ashkenazi Jews and so called Sephardic Jews today because so called Sephardic Jews and Ashkenazi Jews mixed in with people who today are called “Spanish” when they are in fact Mestizo’s and various Indian tribes. For instance an Ashkenazi Jew could marry a Puerto Rican Indian and be known as a Sephardic Jew because Puerto Ricans speak Spanish and was a Spanish colony. Sephardic Jews claim they came to Spain from the time of Solomon, but the problem with that is Jews (the people of Judah) didn’t call themselves Jews (or even the House of Judah) then, they called themselves Israelites and somehow disregard the other brothers altogether conveniently. That in itself ought to have you investigating this further, but Jews have made it so you have to go on a wild goose chase to get to the truth. That is basically the tactics of Jews in a nutshell. They will tell you Sephardic or Sefared means Spanish in one place and say it doesn’t mean Spanish in another like here:
There they say (above link) Sefared is a biblical location, but it isn’t Spain because the Israelites called Spain Tarshish as shown here:
Early history (before 300)
Some associate the country of Tarshish, as mentioned in the books of Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, I Kings, Jonah and Romans, with a locale in southern Spain. In generally describing Tyre’s empire from west to east, Tarshish is listed first (Ezekiel 27.12–14), and in Jonah 1.3 it is the place to which Jonah sought to flee from the Lord; evidently it represents the westernmost place to which one could sail.
If Tarshish was indeed Spain, Jewish contact with Iberia may date back to the time of Solomon. The relationship would likely have been one based on trade. Ezekiel 27.12 describes such a connection: “Tarshish did business with you out of the abundance of your great wealth; silver, iron, tin, and lead they exchanged with you for your wares”, and as much is demonstrated in I Kings 10.22: “For the king had a fleet of ships of Tarshish at sea with the fleet of Hiram. Once every three years the fleet of ships of Tarshish used to come bringing gold, silver, ivory, apes, and peacocks.”
Here is another view of definition of Sefared:
An example of this practice is the use to which the term Sepharad has been put. In Israeli Hebrew, the current Spanish state is called Sepharad; but Sepharad never corresponded to what is nowadays known as Spain, either in antiquity or in the Middle Ages. The first appearance of the term Sepharad is in the Bible in the Book of Obadiah, verse 20. In this fragment, Sepharad refers to a place in Asia Minor. For unknown reasons, from about the time of the Gaonim of Babylon, this name began to be employed to refer to land on the Iberian Peninsula under Muslim rule. Later its use was extended to include the whole of Castile. However, it was never used to refer to the land of the Catalan-speakers. The territory that in the present day is known as Spain was not known by this name until well into the sixteenth century. From then on the word Sephardim has been used to refer to all descendants of the Jews that were expelled from the Peninsula. For a long time, researchers from abroad (Kauffman, Benedikt, Septimus, Schwarzfuchs, Toaff, Dinour, Assis, Touati-Wachsstock and so on) and from Catalunya (Feliu, Riera, Maravall…) have demonstrated, published and otherwise spread the idea that Sepharad is the term the Jews used in mediaeval times to refer to Muslim lands on the Iberian Peninsula. Among other sources, these writers based their assertion on numerous testimonies of mediaeval Jewish authors that perfectly distinguished between Catalunya and Sepharad. Rabbi Yitshaq Sheshet Perfet, Isaac Lattes de Montpellier, Avraham ibn Daud and Maimonides himself are some examples. The failure to accept that the Jews of the Catalan-speaking territories of mediaeval times were not part of Sepharad is to falsify history. Such an act leads to a series of errors that are hard to justify.
Obadiah 1:20 (NKJV) “And the captivity of this host of the children of Israel, that are among the Canaanites, even unto Zarephath, and the captivity of Jerusalem, that is in Sepharad, shall possess the cities of the South.”
Were Jews taken captive in Spain? No folks, didn’t happen.
The mediaeval Jews that lived under Christian rule on the Iberian Peninsula, which they referred to collectively as the ‘Land of Edom’, or specifically with the name of each kingdom, possessed characteristics that included their vernacular, social customs, political organisation, liturgical rituals and so on that were not Sephardi but rather Catalan. In the same way that a Christian from Castile showed special traits that distinguished them from a Christian from Catalunya or Galicia, so did the Jews. The supposed unity of the Jews at the time of their definitive expulsion in 1492, seeing them as a well-defined, compact collective known as Sephardite, is mere fantasy. It makes no sense to allow it to continue to exist. What is more, this myth does not help us to label the Catalan Jews that fled around the time of the events of 1391. Neither does it help to answer why the Jewish communities installed in Africa and various points around the Mediterranean before 1492 also came to be known as Sephardis once their fellow Jews from the Peninsula joined them.
The Jews, like the Christians living under the Catalan monarchy, developed their own activities in an independent territory that was neither Tsarfat (contemporary France), nor Sepharad (modern-day Spain). These were the lands where Catalan is spoken: Catalunya, Mallorca, València and Roussillon (as well as a part of Occitania), Provence itself and the Languedoc. It consisted of a Jewish Occitan-Catalan nature, giving rise to a uniquely Catalan variety of Judaism. An awareness of a Catalan identity (which, as we have seen is by no means solely political) is well-documented in Hebrew texts of the period. We see how they are maintained throughout the early period of the Diaspora, until a point is reached where, while never ceasing to be Jews, those in exile lost the memory of their Catalan past at an unknown period of time. A subsequent distortion of history led them to believe that they and the rest of the Jews expelled from the Peninsula were Sephardis. The intention of this falsehood was to consolidate a supposed political, cultural and linguistic unity that never actually existed. If we wish to be faithful to history, therefore, when we wish to refer to mediaeval Jews that lived in Catalan-speaking lands, we must be precise and speak strictly of Catalan Jews.
What I am doing here is trying to find the quintessential Jew that is the prototype of all these other Jews even though the Judahites and all Israelites were based on a 100% pure race. That is the fact of the Bible whether you believe it or not it is what Christians must believe and it is what Jews must believe. The only thing one could conclude is that both disregard the Bible altogether and or disregard Biology altogether. You can’t do it folks. Either one is lying and the other is asleep or both are lying.
As I have said since I started in the Jew subject is the basis of all the answers about Jews begins with the word “Jew” itself. It needs to be investigated from the inside out and not the usual way because they are not usual people (species of people). What makes a Jew a Jew? If Ashkenazi’s were converted Jews, who converted them and who converted the Jews before that? Race has absolutely nothing to do with it; it is a seed line that passes through anyone it comes in contact with, male or female. Jews then change their names, their locations and their genetics to slowly infect their prey. “If they can’t get us out they will breed us out”. That was not something an English king said about the Irish because the Irish and English knew they were of the same race. They are not trying to breed out the Chinese, but they will use the Chinese to breed the white race out of existence if Blacks or Jews cannot do it on their own.
People hate the race subject, but it’s obviously an important subject when Jews can turn whites, Indians, Blacks etc. into Jews and Jews can never be turned into whites. White people have to understand that looking the other way means a slow death. Jews will never tell us who they are in a debate because they will contradict themselves and lie. You are going to have to rely on your own research. I suggest you start with the so called Sephardic Jewish canard. When you pull out that card the whole Jew house of cards comes down with it. Jews won’t give you the truth and I would prove it to you every day on national radio if I could, but Jews have our media completely controlled like we are just visitors on their alien planet.
In some cases the Ashkenazim are said to have a priestly class that go straight back to Aaron, who was a Levite and not a Jew. He was a Levite because he was of the male lineage of the Levites, however there is no male lineage directly related to Aaron and if there is please show it to me (it’s another Jew hoax). If the Ashkenazim were the Khazars they can’t be any pure race of Jews or Levites and ridiculous to claim they are with no proof. The proof is in racial purity and I don’t know one Jew alive today that is not mixed more than any other people on earth. That is what they are, the antithesis of a race. Interesting that this fits in with everything else they stand for.
I cant download this into your brain and I cant word this like a poem or a song. You are going to have to do the study.