n. pl. hy·poc·ri·sies
1. The practice of professing beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not hold or possess; falseness.
2. An act or instance of such falseness.
Hypocrisy is the state of promoting or administering virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that one does not actually have or is also guilty of violating. Hypocrisy often involves the deception of others and thus can be considered a kind of lie.
Hypocrisy is not simply failing to practice those virtues that one preaches. Samuel Johnson made this point when he wrote about the misuse of the charge of “hypocrisy” in Rambler No. 14:
Nothing is more unjust, however common, than to charge with hypocrisy him that expresses zeal for those virtues which he neglects to practice; since he may be sincerely convinced of the advantages of conquering his passions, without having yet obtained the victory, as a man may be confident of the advantages of a voyage, or a journey, without having courage or industry to undertake it, and may honestly recommend to others, those attempts which he neglects himself. No different from sending your fellow countrymen off to fight a war you would not partake in yourself. Johnson allows cowardice to be an excuse for hypocrisy and there are no excuses.
Thus, an alcoholic’s advocating temperance, for example, would not be considered an act of hypocrisy as long as the alcoholic made no pretense of constant sobriety. A talk show host that has his phone lines cut off to callers who oppose them is the greatest form of hypocrisy in plain sight today. These people know full well they are hypocrites and have no shame of being one.
In order to be a truther you must seek all truth and not just the truth that advances your current agenda. If you claim something is truth one day you can’t claim it isn’t the next and vice versa. I don’t know how many people in the so called truth movement are hypocrites, but there are certainly a lot. These people are obviously shills or too stupid to see their own hypocrisy. If I am being hypocritical I want to know. The comments are wide open and I want to be as truthful as I possibly can because without truth or closing the door to truth you are not of it. These internet radio hosts are no different from the main stream in this regard, they are simply whistling a different tune for a gullible audience that doesn’t seek the truth on their own. If your lines are crossed you aint a truther.
Let me give some examples of just in the last few days. One of the most vehement antichristian talk show hosts on the internet who claims to be against “elite Jews” is constantly telling his audience how ridiculous the Bible is (Old and New), but when trying to prove a point about today’s Jews he compares them to people who were in Egypt (called Israelites). In fact Joseph was not a Jew either. In one segment they don’t believe any of the Bible and the next they are using it to prove their truth. These people will read a book to you about Khazars and then the next day they are comparing Bibi Netanyahu to Moses or Abraham (the Ugly Truthers) proving they can’t hold the truth for 2 days. When you see this behavior you have to wonder why these people don’t stop and regroup and ask themselves “which is it?”, but they refuse to. Are these people Khazars and no relation to the Jews of the Bible or is the Bible a fantasy story that these same Jews dreamed up in their heads? It’s so twisted and stupid it’s like explaining an Adams Family episode to someone who has never seen it.
Why are these people (shills) always contradicting themselves and not a soul is allowed to call them on it? If you don’t believe in the Bible that’s one thing, but using the Bible to prove it was the very same Jews of today is just simply two faced trash no matter how you lay it out.
Some so called truthers avoid religion because they know they can’t say a word about it in fear of being completely slapped down in disgrace. These types avoid all Biblical talk altogether with intelligent guests. The unintelligent Biblical talk show hosts rarely have a qualified Biblical scholar on their show and it is very evident who these people are. They can’t handle the truth folks, plain and simple. One or two might have a person who knows about Christianity on their show, but suddenly that show turns into a circus. The guest is stonewalled, callers are planned ahead of time to ambush the guest in any way he or she can which gets even uglier. In a particular shill show on RBN Texe Marrs was on and the host was compelled to ask an email question sent in which he had never done before. The question was “Do you hate Jews?”. This is the question only Jews use to stunt their opposition. A simple way to answer that question is to first tell them that this is a loaded question. First you must explain what a jew is and if you don’t know I cannot answer dumb questions. I have not yet heard a Jew explain what a Jew is and stand his ground on it without pure and utter hypocrisy. This same talk show host is anti government and not anti Jew. He goes on about all of our government agencies being corrupt on a daily basis and then threatened an emailer over the air that he was sending all his or her emails straight to the FBI.
Ever notice that these same people have to have a Jew on their show at least once or twice a week to trust these very same Jews they believe made up these Biblical stories whose families never set foot in Palestine before the 1940’S? It must be obvious they know they are Jews because why else would they put them on a pedestal for supposedly telling the truth against their own ancestry? I wouldn’t trust anyone against my ancestry so why would I trust someone against his own?
These are just a few instances of blatant hypocrisy of 90% of the so called truth movement. Its right in your face repeating the same bait and switch BS you grew up being force fed day after day. These shills need to be nailed down on what words mean in every category. They need to be asked what these words mean to them and not deviate from them;
- What is a Jew? Be very specific or I will pounce on you.
- Does the word Jew only have one definition? If not tell us the others.
- What is a Khazar?
- What is an Ashkenazi?
- What is a Sephardic Jew?
- Do you believe the Bible was written by Jews?
- Was Jesus a Jew?
- What is a Semite?
- Do you believe the Bible?
- Do you think people should trust Jews?
- What is a Zionist?
Before you even get to question 2 you will see how full of hypocrisy these people are. It doesn’t make a hell of a lot of sense to even utter a word you have no clue about. The truth can be nailed down and a truther can be nailed down by simply asking them what certain words mean and then sticking to their answers. It doesn’t matter if you believe in the Bible, but the fact is all these words come from it. If these words are not being used in accordance with the Bible it is for everyone to see. If people use these words falsely that are defined in the book they are either perpetuating the hypocrisy purposely or they are fools who obviously have never looked for the truth or simply not capable of getting it.