The Net

The internet is no different from the main stream media when it comes to Christianity and Jews know the internet can be a powerful avenue for truth. Jews don’t come amongst us to give us truth and morality, but to destroy it. If that isn’t evident to the common Christian and yet you are trusting Jews and their minions what the books of the Bible say, don’t you think you should read the book yourself first before you even think about trusting the people who opposed these books? Don’t you think that people who have their phones cut off would be confronted when they lie with proof that everyone can see by opening that book for themselves? Lies get around before the truth gets its boots on for a reason and they didn’t just quit doing this when the internet began.

Below are some black and white proofs that Jesus most definitely referred to the only scriptures there were in his day (there was no New Testament as of this time).

Luke chapter 24

23 And when they found not his body, they came, saying, that they had also seen a vision of angels, which said that he was alive.

24 And certain of them which were with us went to the sepulchre, and found it even so as the women had said: but him they saw not.

25 Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken:

26 Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory?

27 And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.

Joh 5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify OF ME.

Joh 5:39 You examine the Scriptures carefully because you suppose that in them you have eternal life.

Yet they testify about me.

1Pe 1:10 Of which salvation the prophets have enquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of

the grace that should come unto you:

1Pe 1:11 Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify,

when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow.

Jews rejected Jesus Christ because the word Jew is sometimes “those people who claim to be Jews (of Judah) and are not”.

Certainly Peter didn’t reject Jesus (a Judahite nor all The Judahites that became the first Christians)

Jews (or Judeans that lived in Judea who were not true Judahites) did not believe in the scriptures and that can be proven

over and over again with or without the Talmud, (the Talmud is not the Old Testament).

Who did Jesus already predetermine to sacrifice himself for? It certainly was not for the synagogue of satan jews.

He claimed he came for his lost sheep enough times it’s a wonder how Christians ever got this ridiculous notion

that God in the flesh would have come for people who he said were not his sheep.

7:14 For [it is] evident that our Lord sprang out of Judah…

Romans 1:3 Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh;

Romans 9:3 For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh:

9:4 Who are Israelites;(NOT JEWS!!!) to whom [pertaineth] the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service [of God], and the promises;

9:5 Whose [are] the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ [came], who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen.

Rev. 5:5 And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof.

Rev. 22:16 I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, [and] the bright and morning star.

Heb 7:21 (For those priests were made without an oath; but this with an oath by him that said unto

him, The Lord sware and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec:)

Jesus was not a Levite and the Cohanim are not of Levi.

This is dedicated to the people who listen to the liars (the Ugly Truthers) who are Jews pretending to be Muslims, Jews pretending to be Christians who don’t believe in the Old Testament who could never be of Israel, atheists who simply toss all of it out or crypto Jews who try to use words falsely they plucked out of the Bible and use it to cut you off. The only way you will ever know is if you read the Bible correctly. The number one goal of these Ugly Truthers is not to have you believe Israel bombed the USS Liberty or Israel bombed the WTC. Their intent is to have you hate who Israel really is. If you read the Bible and you understand word meanings you would understand that “the Jews” are not Israel in any way shape or form. It is all babel to trip you up and cut you off.

What is Judaism? Do you ever hear the Ugly Truthers discuss this? Do they believe Judaism is for Judahites or do they believe Judaism is nothing more than people pretending to be Judahites who have obviously disregarded the Israelites altogether? The only way you will ever get to the truth is to keep a machete and a shovel to clear up all the lies that you are being barraged with. If you quit you will become your enemy’s victim and they couldn’t give a wrap about you. These folks are Communists that have no God and they know it. I’ve said it many times before; if you accept their meanings of words that are obviously false you will accept anything they say. They won’t debate what the Bible says and that my friends is all you will ever need to know because the truth is still being rejected and always will be by the same usual suspects.

The truth makes sense and there are people with us on this earth that loathe it. Don’t ever forget it.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

23 Responses to The Net

  1. John says:

    Hey Mel, I read a lot more from In particular, this 6 part series written by Eli James. It’s a LONG read, but it explains the Two-seed doctrine in great detail.

  2. 卍巴 says:

    Re “Dr Lasha Darkmoon” / “Lalara Pandora” / “Israel Shamir” / “Xanadu” / “Daddy” / “John Allen Montecristo” / “John Allen Montechristo” / “Lucy” / “Miriam K” / “Irma Kleckstein” :

    Verdict: All the same Kike. + 946 + 947 + 948 + 949

    • melgibstein says:

      I’ll read that a little later. Great shot of Marky Mark in front of the White House. Oy!

    • melgibstein says:

      He or she lets me post so I do. Not many people do that, but Jews do occasionally let some truth in. I busted on Dumkopf (Mark) pretty bad and he still gave Darkmoon’s site a plug. Yup, gotta be a Jew. Anyone else wouldve been blacklisted. I will still write on there and anywhere else I can. I know I scared a few of the Truther douche’s out of there when they found out I wasnt going to be silenced. The G Gordon Liddy show had a Jew producer who let me talk all the time. Sometimes they let you talk to trip you up, but they never do. I used to have Jew friends a long time ago and told them the truth all the time. They know whats going on, its not like they are shocked to hear it. They have no defense against it and if they try to kill me- they better be prepared for a payback.

  3. Barney says:


    Sorry to be a nuisance Mel, but I’m no longer able to comment on another site unless I install something I know nothing about called “jetpack”, and an on-line friend says he now needs a password to comment on WordPress sites, so I’m hoping it isn’t something that applies everywhere or the internet will effectively be dead as far as our kind of sites are concerned.

    No need to ask which group is responsible.

  4. 卍巴 says:

    Here’s another aspect of their Ugly “truth”:

    Looks like they removed Golda Meir, Trotsky, and a few others they used to praise.

    They still have Lenin, Marx, Jabotinsky, Rasputin, MLK, Malcolm X.

    Here’s K vs K (= K wins) from Ugly Glenn, “The Men In Black”:

    Michael Hoffman wrote much better against the Neturei Karta K’s, w/o the Ugly Troof-added anti-Christian nonsense and Ugly Glenn’s whiney kvetching and bloviating.

  5. 卍巴 says:

    Michael A Hoffman, 2009:

    “Judaic protests against Israeli violence are commendable when they also condemn the roots of Israeli violence as found in the ideological doctrines of Chazal (the “sages”) of Orthodox Judaism, or at the very least when not denying those roots. For example, to their credit, in the Guardian newspaper in Britain on January 10, over seventy Judaic activists wrote to condemn Israeli atrocities in Gaza. While they did not trace the roots of Zionist mass murder to the Talmud, neither did they deny it. They did, however, make an astute and damaging comparison between Governor-General Hans Frank in Nazi-occupied Poland and Matan Vilnai, the Israeli defense minister who actually spoke last February of perpetrating a shoah (extermination) in Gaza.

    “The hasbara does emerge in statements by Judaics such as Alexei Sayle who told a crowd of demonstrators in London, “It is long past time to stop allowing the state of Israel to call itself the ‘Jewish state.”

    “The masters at this sort of disinformation are the Neturei Karta sect of Hasidic Judaism who were received by the Iranian President at the revisionist conference in Tehran and who parade around the US and Europe condemning Zionism as being against “the Torah” (that’s the Torah Shebeal Peh, the traditions of the rabbis, not the Torah of Yahweh, which the rabbis nullify).

    “Neturei Karta and the larger Satmar body of Hasidim, who are also anti-Zionist, are a function of the Cryptocracy at one of its highest levels of operation. The many befuddled and ignorant goyim who cooperate with these groups in disseminating the propaganda that the rabbinic Torah (Talmud) is a document of peace and love inimical to Zionism and the Israeli state, serve to rescue the religion of Judaism from the odium it so richly deserves as the ideological engine that drives the Israeli war machine.

    “Those who support and promote the anti-Zionist Orthodox rabbinic movements should at least be aware that they are backing 1700 years of Talmudic Judaic dogma as it existed from the aftermath of the Bar Kokhba revolt in the second century A.D. through the nineteenth century. After their disastrous ancient military uprising against Rome, the rabbis taught that Judaism should, until the coming of the Moshiach (”Messiah”), advance almost exclusively through stealth, guile and the armies of the goyim. This “Neturei Karta” style Judaism was just as much the enemy of Christendom as Orthodox Judaism is today. The difference being that in our time the majority of Orthodox rabbis believe the most effective road to dominion is through the teachings of Moses Hess, Rabbi Kook and the “religious Zionism” that came into full flower in the twentieth century and which advocated the development of Judaic armies and the projection of Judaic military power.

    “The Neturei Karta rabbis are perpetrating a hoax. Zionism is just as authentically Talmudic as Neturei Karta Judaism, with the exception being that whereas Neturei Karta Judaism prefers camouflage and deceit, the religious Zionism of the Israeli state favors camouflage, deceit and Judaic military power.”

    • melgibstein says:

      Last Santos Bonnacci jew whop video. Bonacci most likely reads right to left and that way his initials are BS. Thats more truthful than anything he’s ever said. I’ll listen to him right after Danny Bonajucci in the next life.

  6. melgibstein says:

    I like to know who my enemy is, but I dont want to know everything, you know what I mean? They are fruitcake nutjobs that need to be frog marched to the South Pole. Down there they can mo;lest walruses for all I care. I dont really want to know them better, I want to forget they exist and out of our countries. Jews messiah is Satan. What they say or believe I dont trust.

  7. melgibstein says:

    The latest is “Israel is a white country”. They dont say this stuff by accident. Why didnt they say “The Jewish state is a white country”? They can say whatever they want- people just dont give a ….*. We live with lying, thieving, molesting, organ stealing creatures and lemmings.

  8. melgibstein says:

    Jewish swastica’s in NY.

  9. GTRman says:

    Dont know who he is but he tells it like it is :

  10. Chris says:

    By Rev. Ted Pike

    • melgibstein says:

      I heard it Chris. This is actually good for CI because it shows Ted’s weaknesses. I dont want to make Ted an enemy nor do I want to make enemies with any White Christians or even Whites. We need to talk, debate, seek the truth as we were commanded. If we dont we are through. Anyone can make false accusations and condemn them, but you dont see these guys debating anyone about it. I know for a fact that there are CI people who have studied the Bible for years that Ted will not even respond to (nor any of the Judeo Christians out there). That in itself tells it all. If you arent willing to debate what words mean in the Bible openly you are no longer seeking truth. There is always more truth to learn, but without the basic foundation its for naught.

      If someone is wrong they need to be pointed out why. Ted did nothing of the sort in this recording. Israelites dispersed all over Europe, Turkey, Iran, the Middle East and not just Western Europe. Ted is using some of the hard line so called CI beliefs that are just plain wrong and there to mislead. Anyone who reads the Old Testament has to know it is about RACE. Seed comes from the Greek word “sperma”. Father, brother, seed, branches are not meant to be spiritual, but racial. Ted claims its Jewish to be CI, but its really the other way around. Its Jewish to be a Judeo all the way.

      Jews are not Israelites- period. Get over it, Ted. Esau was a white man, but his children were not and why he was rejected. He obviously never really read the Bible correctly. If you cant see the Bible is about race and that Jesus came to redeem ( re means to deem again) Israel and nobody else. His lineage goes straight back to Adam through Noah who was perfect in his race. Jews are not perfect in their race, if they were they wouldnt have so many genetic diseases and defects. Its as plain as the hooked nose on their face.

  11. Balder says:

    How to have the last word OR How to intimidate the poor slob OR How to prove you know everything.
    …..on the The Art of being an Expert.
    Appearance: Make sure you are taller than your victim. Wear elevator shoes or stand on a box, if necessary. Wear an expensive suit. Carry an attaché case. If military make sure your bars are polished and your chest covered with battle ribbons and medals. Always look down at your subject wearing a slightly sneering smile. Wear a name tag with appropriate reference such as C.E.O Polystyrene Condom Reclamation Enterprises. or, Herr Doctor Professor or, ‘I slept with Hillary before she did with Janet’. It must be distinctive and not just a rehashed “me too”.

    If properly executed, you allow the sucker to gawk for a few moment while you look over his head. This usually leaves him seeking the next hole he can crawl into. He’ll then tell his friends that he MET YOU!! Often, handing out an autograph will terminate the association with the least effort or your part.

    Conversation: Feel him out for his level of vocabulary comprehension while engaged in light talk about the weather and the price of eggs. If he’s just plain Bill, make sure you use words such as synergy and syzygy, and toss in ‘instauration’ for flavor. “S” words are great, due to the hissing sound that can accompany them. Tell a joke about the poor man you dealt with the other day who didn’t know a ‘compliment’ from a ‘complement’. If you use enough polysyllabic words, you’ll have won half the battle since he won’t know what you are talking about and you don’t have to either. If he starts to bite his lips, you’ll know you’ve nailed him and you can excuse yourself confident that he knows you to be an expert.

    Sooner or later, he might ask a question or present a point of view. This is the sparring stage.

    Topic: Always cite references! This is cardinal. Never cite a reference which might possible be used against you, i.e., checked. Therefore, make them up. If your opponent questions your sources because he never heard of them, take the opportunity to explain the expanse of your personal library of rare classical books, some of them being housed in glass cases. Don’t forget to mention that one of your books used to be owned by King Dioptra of Gerbert. Create and memorize exotic, or foreign, names such as Bonaventura Cavalieri, Brahmagupta and Pierre Chuquet. Never hesitate. Practice making all of your statements as cool and authoritative as “One plus one equals two.” Always give a hesitating, and slight, approval of your opponents point but counter with something such as, “Yes, he was correct in some minor details, but Alcuin d’Bede, in the year 1889, demonstrated beyond question that … … … This was verified in modern times — 1993 I believe — by the study completed at the University of Hypatia, which is about 13 kilometers from Athens. Terrible climate there, wouldn’t you say?” It is well to show some doubt concerning trivia but never cease to be firm in your conviction that you are smarter than the idiot you are addressing. After all, he probably never has had an original thought in his life and therefore what he thinks he knows, is merely the thoughts of another anyway. Therefore do not fall into the trap of believing that you are lying for your antagonist probably doesn’t remember what he thought he learned and thus will be speaking rubbish also. Watch for errors in grammar and pronunciation and point them out. This usually assures that his line of thought will be broken. If it isn’t, then clear your throat in a most forceful manner. If the fellow appears somewhat doubtful, shuffle the papers in your attaché case — “I have it right here.” — but end the search with, “This reminds me ….. “, and change the topic.

    Conclusion: The object of confrontational discourse in not one of learning since most rarely change their minds about anything. The object here is to establish your intellectual superiority — which you secretly believe to be true anyway. Always part with a gentle smile complimenting him upon his potential, Perhaps this, “Our exchange was quite rewarding. You show great promise and most of your points were well taken. I fear that if you really applied yourself, I would be confronted with able competition.”

    Caution: Be wary as there are many quiet but potentially volatile people in this world. If you befuddle them too much, they just might rap you in the mouth with a fistful of knuckles causing you to lose a mouthful of teeth amd spend a walletful of dollars.

    The essence of all debate is not a contest between you and the other fellow. It is a battle between his references and your references. The most interesting combat occurs when both of you are manufacturing your own references and quoting statistics from studies which never took place and from people who never existed. Do not overdue it, but always include numbers. The power of, “The study shows that 82.547% of those tested ……” is certainly greater than, “The study shows that most of those tested ……” Better exercise judgment here for often numbers will work to your disadvantage. “We know that the majority of people accept the fact ….” and opposed to “We know that 50.0002% of the people accept the fact…..”

    Since outcomes are often unpredictable preliminary intimidation is primary. If circumstances permit, it might do well to have a machete hanging from your belt, or introduce an Arnold Schwarzenegger look alike as your brother.

  12. Balder says:

    THERE IS NO REASON TO SUPPRESS A VIEWPOINT UNLESS IT IS TRUE, because a false viewpoint can easily be combated with facts and logic, while truth cannot be combated except by lies which are vulnerable to refutation.

    Or to put it another way, the ‘racist’ view HAS to be suppressed, because if it weren’t, MOST PEOPLE WOULD BECOME ‘RACISTS’!

    Of course, this could be extended to include the Holohoax in all its 666 varieties. Also add National Socialism which is never presented as a historical, political topic other than blubbering about “gas chambers”, “lamp shades”, penis grinders and pedal-driven head-bashing machines.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s